Nils Silinevics
Partner · AML & Crypto Compliance · Former FIU Investigator
You've seen your account restricted pending source-of-funds verification on WhiteBit. WhiteBit, headquartered in Lithuania (White Bit UAB), is regulated by Lithuanian Financial Crime Investigation Service (FCIS) under Lithuanian Law on Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (transposing EU AMLD6). The exchange uses Chainalysis for blockchain analytics and Sumsub for identity verification. WhiteBit holds a Lithuanian crypto license, making it subject to full EU AML directives — which means stricter compliance requirements than Seychelles-based exchanges but also more predictable resolution processes through EU regulatory frameworks. WhiteBit freezes accounts when their Lithuanian compliance team flags transactions under EU AML Directive 6 requirements, particularly for high-value transfers or sanctions-adjacent activity. You receive an email or in-platform notification asking you to prove where your cryptocurrency came from. The request may include demands for bank statements, pay slips, tax returns, business records, sale contracts, mining proof, or inheritance documents — depending on how you acquired your crypto.
WhiteBit freezes accounts when their Lithuanian compliance team flags transactions under EU AML Directive 6 requirements, particularly for high-value transfers or sanctions-adjacent activity. WhiteBit holds a Lithuanian crypto license, making it subject to full EU AML directives — which means stricter compliance requirements than Seychelles-based exchanges but also more predictable resolution processes through EU regulatory frameworks. This background matters because it shapes how WhiteBit handles compliance — and how we approach resolving your case.
The compliance framework: WhiteBit operates under Lithuanian Law on Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (transposing EU AMLD6), overseen by Lithuanian Financial Crime Investigation Service (FCIS). Their compliance infrastructure uses Chainalysis for blockchain analytics and Sumsub for identity verification. WhiteBit is known for EU-licensed exchange with competitive futures markets, serving European and CIS traders — and their compliance team is calibrated to flag deviations from typical user behavior in that segment.
What triggers source of funds request on WhiteBit:
Real case — EU regulatory framework: A Russian-born EU resident had €85,000 frozen on WhiteBit because their compliance team flagged his account under EU sanctions screening — despite his holding a valid EU residence permit. WhiteBit's Lithuanian compliance team required proof that his funds were not connected to sanctioned Russian entities. We provided his EU residency documentation, source-of-funds from his EU-based business, and a formal declaration of non-association with sanctioned individuals. Resolution took 12 days.
What WhiteBit requires to resolve this: Depending on the trigger, WhiteBit may ask for government-issued photo ID (verified through Sumsub), proof of address (utility bill or bank statement within 3 months), AML compliance review (exchange statements, bank records, payslips, tax returns, or business documents), detailed transaction explanations with on-chain evidence, and in some cases a video verification interview. The challenge: WhiteBit rarely tells you which specific trigger caused the source of funds request, so you're guessing at what documentation to provide — and each rejected submission makes the next one harder.
Our approach is specific to WhiteBit: Because WhiteBit is EU-regulated, we use EU regulatory frameworks — including the right to a timely compliance decision under AMLD6 — to force resolution. Lithuanian FCIS is responsive to complaints about unreasonable delays. WhiteBit's compliance team understands EU law better than offshore exchanges, which actually makes negotiation more productive.
Source of Funds Request on WhiteBit — our strategy: We prepare a structured Source of Funds package that traces the origin of your funds through every layer: from fiat acquisition to crypto purchase to transfer to the platform. Each step is documented with primary evidence and a cover letter explaining the compliance context.
The submission that matters: Instead of submitting through WhiteBit's standard support channels (where you'll get automated responses or generic template replies), we prepare a professional legal submission — a structured compliance package with a cover letter from a Swiss law firm citing Lithuanian Financial Crime Investigation Service (FCIS) obligations and Lithuanian Law on Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (transposing EU AMLD6). WhiteBit's compliance team processes legal submissions differently from regular user tickets — they're assigned to senior compliance officers, not support agents, and they bypass the automated response loop that delays most cases by weeks.
When standard compliance isn't enough: Some situations fall outside the normal compliance flow — inherited crypto holdings, accounts registered under another person's name, unprovable source of funds through conventional documentation, or cross-jurisdictional complications where your residence, the exchange's jurisdiction, and the fiat banking path all differ. If that sounds like your case, our complex cases practice handles scenarios that other firms decline.
Further reading: our guide on how to prove source of funds for crypto transactions covers the documentation and legal strategy in more depth.
We trace the origin of your funds through every layer: fiat acquisition → crypto purchase → transfer to {p_name}. {p_name}'s compliance team needs a clear chain — we build it with primary evidence at each step.
We prepare a structured Source of Funds package: bank statements showing fiat origin, exchange purchase records, on-chain transaction history, and a narrative flowchart. Each layer is documented with timestamps and transaction hashes.
We submit the package through {p_name}'s compliance team — not the standard support queue. Our cover letter references {aml_law} and explains the legitimate origin of every transaction in question.
{p_name} accepts the Source of Funds documentation and releases the hold. We confirm your withdrawal and trading functions are fully restored and advise on record-keeping for future {p_name} transactions.
WhiteBit, as a Lithuanian-licensed exchange, must comply with EU sanctions regulations. EU sanctions restrict certain Russian nationals from accessing EU financial services — but there are exemptions for EU residents, dual nationals, and individuals who can demonstrate non-association with sanctioned activities. If you hold an EU residence permit, WhiteBit cannot simply freeze your account based on nationality. We help frame your case under the specific EU sanctions exemptions that apply.
Paradoxically, yes — if you're a legitimate user. WhiteBit's EU license means they follow EU AML directives, which include your right to a timely compliance decision and due process. Offshore exchanges (BVI, Seychelles) can freeze accounts indefinitely with no regulatory oversight. With WhiteBit, we can escalate to Lithuanian FCIS if they delay unreasonably. This regulatory pressure typically resolves cases faster.
Acceptable documentation depends on how you acquired your crypto. For earnings: payslips, employment contracts, tax returns. For trading profits: exchange statements showing purchase history. For business income: company registration, audited financials, invoices. For inheritance: death certificate, will, estate distribution documents. For mining: hardware receipts, mining pool records, electricity bills. The compliance team looks for a clear, documented chain from fiat origin to the current crypto balance.
DeFi yields, staking rewards, and liquidity pool returns are legitimate sources of funds — but they're harder to document than exchange purchases. We prepare on-chain evidence: transaction hashes, smart contract interactions, staking pool records, and yield farming positions. The key is showing that your DeFi activity was conducted with funds that themselves have a clear origin.
Yes. Under AML regulations applicable to the platform's jurisdiction, platforms are legally obligated to obtain Source of Funds for high-risk or high-value transactions. Failure to provide adequate documentation gives the platform the right — and in many cases the legal obligation — to close your account and potentially report you to financial authorities.
Tell us what source-of-funds documentation WhiteBIT requested and your situation. We respond within 6 hours.